Hollywood guilty? The sexualization of children? NEVER!
Okay, well, just maybe people like Ron Gleason, Dr. Laura, Dennis Prager, many others and myself have been correct all along. Does it always take a Federal study to convince people?
We've all heard of "pork" as it relates to the extra stuff thrown in by legislators to get a certain bill passed. For instance they'll put in money for a new city park on a bill that is for the prohibition of smoking in public schools, what usually happens is that the bill gets passed: everyone cheers for outlawing smoking in public schools, but no one ever hears about the millions of dollars of taxpayer money that goes to fund some new park up the street. The park sorta "sneaks" in. Well here's a similar situation. Notice that alongside the prohibition to have sex with students, which is a good thing, is the (completely unrelated) prohibition: "Refraining from trying to influence students with their own political or religious beliefs." First off, how is this at all related to the real issue supposedly addressed by the proposal? And more importantly, is this not a not-so-clandestined attack on sharing the Gospel with students? In other words what we have here is another subtle move away from Christianity towards a completely secular school system.