So i just got done reading the Drone, a new sort of year round winbag on Covblogs. I can honestly say I was sort of saddened. I mean I understand what the kids are trying to do, and its something that I have tried in the past to do, a sort of edgy, in your face, overly cynical, and offensive humor. I tried it and realized it was too devisive and too hurtful. My dad taught me the value of good humor, and I'm not talking about those ice cream bars. He taught me about how humor should not be cynical and hurtful (Unless it was the 3 stooges). That was also re-emphasized by a chapel i went to at Covenant where Dr. Green gave a talk on the value of Wonder and Awe. I took a step back from that and realized that cynicism really destroys our sense of wonder. Green talked about how his daughter would get so amazed at the sight of a lamp turning on or a car driving by. The things that we take for granted truly deserve some wonder and awe. God's saving grace being one of those things that we should just fall on our knees in awe and wonder "why me?" It sort of opened my eyes to just how my cynicism hurt my view of this world and also my savior.
But back to the drone...
I also found it kind of sad how the kids (writing the articles) were so against any sort of negative criticism or attacks. They criticized the people who were offended as not being able to take a joke. Thats our societies way of saying "Screw you" to being sensitive and caring of other people's feelings and opinions.
"But Chris its all just a joke. Its just sarcasm and satire..." So what. I found at Covenant, and in today's society that if its a joke no matter how crass, how mean spirited, or how wrong that it doesn't matter, because in the end its just a joke. Well, to that I would say how bout the bullies in school that beat up kids and laugh as they humilate a student in front of his peers? It was all in the name of fun/humor. "Well Chris sticks and stones...." Yeah thats a load of BS. Just ask any kid who grew up fat and was teased verbally by the other kids... I was one of those kids, I hated my life because of other kids laughing at my weight. Humor can be painful.
The writers of the drone, who remain annoynmous, seem to explode at the criticism they receive on their pieces. They rail back their theology of "its just a joke" like it was the Westminster Confession of Faith. I know from experience that when you snap back at someone's criticism it usually means they hit it right on the head and you just don't want to admit it. They've called your bluff and the only thing you can do is blow up at them, which seems like what is happening on the Drone. I'm sure of the fact that in the hearts of some of those writers that they are doubting what they are doing on that blog. I think that some of them will look back upon what they wrote and feel ashamed once wisdom and understanding catches up to them.
I don't think they (Roe) should shut down their site or anything. Maybe two years ago I would have said yes but I've come to think forcing people to change is not a good way to change a heart. But I do hope that the writers do put some honest prayer into asking God, "Is humor really worth causing others pain and anger?" Or even, "is my humor hurting my view of Covenant? The people around me? My faith?"
I dunno know. I just read a few articles and some of the posts on the Drone and was like, "Where is Christ's love in this? How is this in any way beneficial to anyone?"
Kids today... whatever happened to just using free time to pick up chicks and play Halo??
Posted by holtonian at March 7, 2004 12:47 AM | TrackBackThose are good thoughts, Holton. You are a wise cat, for a spaceman.
I wouldn't be too hard on the Droners, though. Part of the college process is figuring out how far is too far, with humor, beer, or anything else. And if you look at my posts, you can tell that for some of us, some time after college might be needed too. (You will also note that for some people -- I'm not naming names, but it should be kinda obvious -- an entire lifetime isn't long enough.) Jesus is still tinkering with all of us. I think the blogosphere is just one more place for that tinkering.
Posted by: mesh at March 7, 2004 01:17 AMGood points. I'm fuming at the moment because when my sister attempted to make a point about how articles like the one causing all the controversy make minority students feel unwelcome, rather than responding to her post, certain people who will remain unnamed resorted to ad hominem attacks on the way that she dresses. While I expect college students to act immature, when it's the people who are supposedly mature adults making the irrelevant personal attacks, it's not really setting a good example.
Posted by: kathryn at March 7, 2004 01:27 AMHere's my over-valued two cents: 1) I am vehemently in favor of free speech, so I can't say that they should be shut down. 2) A concept we seem to have gotten into our heads in America is that people have the right not to get their feelings hurt or be offended. That's not in the Constitution. 3) The issue comes down to being between the authors and the people they hurt, and further still comes down to their motives for writing what they write, which is between themselves and God.
In response to Kathryn's post, I would say that going after someone's style of dress for political comments they made is immature. Just immature.
Posted by: James at March 7, 2004 02:19 AMI don't know what the big fuss is about. At my time at CC I definitely heard plenty of ebonics thrown around from the bball team (Phil Farmer, anyone?) and I sure as hell saw plenty of sweater vests in Sanderson.
Posted by: Lutz at March 7, 2004 05:25 PMChris this is exactly what I meant when I jokingly said that you were a straight man (it was of course also meant in the "straight is great" sense, too). You stand up tall and point the finger where it needs to be pointed, without being a jerk about it. I thought that article was pretty mean too, especially to that poor girl. Even if it wasn't necessarily racist, I doubt it did anything to help race relations at Covenant (and, despite what some (mostly white, I'd say) people would probably (and even rightfully) like to think, race relations are still a problem in America, even if we've come a long way (and we have)). So, like I said, this is what I meant by you telling it straight... this is also why you're my favorite chattaperson to read (although Mesh probably comes in a close second).
Posted by: rob at March 7, 2004 06:43 PMOh, and my dad appreciated your comments. I think he's a swell pastor too. Even though I've given up on convincing him to cut the mustache (I think that if Wesley Willis were still alive, he'd write cut the mustache, not cut that mullet).
Posted by: rob at March 7, 2004 06:45 PMFor the freaking record, I never went after rebekah's critique of the drone, whether via ad hominem OR dealing directly with her arguments.
If you look back closely at the progression of the conversation, after Rebekah made her first comment I made a comment saying that I thought it was great that Rebekah was posting at that I thought she was a fine intramural hockey player (since she was on my team). I didn't mention her argument there, but I simply gave a hello-shout-out.
Then Mesh made a joke about The Drone folks also being naked, which is a reference to Rebekah's infamous nudity letter thingie that got everyone in an uproar when we were at Covenant.
I then made a comment 'bout how I always found it funny that Rebekah wrote that letter when she was also infamous for her short-shorts.
There's the progression of the conversation. I wasn't even addressing her concerns with the Drone article, I think they're great and fine etc. The joking is related only insofar as it occured in the same post as her comment.
Posted by: JosiahQ at March 8, 2004 10:23 AMAlso for the record, by poor girl I meant the reportedly hot one with thin-skinned friends, not the Brightbill.
Posted by: rob at March 8, 2004 12:23 PMThe biggest, saddest thing in my mind is the general lack of anything positive in the drone. I understand where the author is coming from in some of the articles. I understand where people are coming from as far as free speech and a general attitude of "self-criticism is helpful and funny too". The problem that I have more and more with it is more than anything, it tears people down. The funny thing is is that it not only tears down those who are discussed in the article, but also the writer. I think holtie is right on in the sense that cyncism will poison any joy that you might find in life, and honestly, as Christians, we really have more reason to bold-face hope than anyone else. That is why stale, cynical churches sadden me so much. So in the end, I guess I just wish that the writers of the drone, whoever they may be, snap out of it over the next years, grow up and try to see covenant for what it is: A great place to grow and learn, not a place to cynically take potshots at fellow brothers and sisters in Christ just b/c there may be a speck of truth found within the criticism.
Posted by: crabby at March 9, 2004 07:06 PM