From The Identity of the New Testament Text -- Wilbur N. Pickering [h/t Fr John]
There are over 5,000 extant (known) Greek manuscripts (hereafter MSS, or MS when singular) of the New Testament. They range in size from a scrap with parts of two verses to complete New Testaments. They range in date from the second century to the sixteenth. They come from all over the Mediterranean world. They contain several hundred thousand variant readings (differences in the text). The vast majority of these are misspellings or other obvious errors due to carelessness or ignorance on the part of the copyists. However, many thousands of variants remain which need to be evaluated as we seek to identify the precise original wording of the text. How best to go about such a project? This book seeks to provide an answer.Of course, I am not the first to attempt an answer. Numerous answers have been advanced over the years. They tend to form two clusters, or camps, and these camps differ substantially from each other. In very broad and over-simplified terms, one camp generally follows the large majority of the MSS (seldom less than 80 and usually over 95 percent) which are in essential agreement among themselves but which do not date from before the fifth century A.D., while the other generally follows a small handful (often less than ten) of earlier MSS (from the third, fourth and fifth centuries) which not only disagree with the majority, but also disagree among themselves. The second camp has been in general control of the scholarly world for the last 110 years.
The most visible consequence and proof of that control may be seen in the translations of the New Testament into English done during these 110 years. Virtually every one of them reflects a form of the text based upon the few earlier MSS. In contrast to them, the King James Version (AV) and the New King James Version (NKJV) reflect a form of the text based upon the many later MSS. Thus, the fundamental difference between the New Testament in the American Standard Version, Revised Standard Version, New English Bible, Today's English Version, New American Standard Bible, New International Version, etc., on the one hand, and in the AV and NKJV on the other is that they are based on different forms of the Greek text. (There are over 5,500 differences between those two forms.)
The link above is to the entire book-length text. Very interesting reading.
Posted by Clifton at October 2, 2006 06:09 AM | TrackBackA number of essays, most by Dr. Daniel B. Wallace of Dallas Theological Seminary:
http://www.bible.org/topic.php?topic_id=24
and head of the Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts based in nearby Frisco, TX:
http://www.csntm.org/
Dr. Wallace has traveled the world and discovered many heretofore unknown manuscripts. He used to favor the Majority Text (i.e., a text similar to the Textus Receptus), but he explains in various essays - perhaps start with this one:
http://www.bible.org/page.php?page_id=1221
why he considers the advocates (including Pickering) of the Byzantine text-type are in error.
Posted by: Eric Weiss at October 2, 2006 11:57 AMGood stuff, Eric. Thanks.
Here's a middle position somewhere between the two:
http://www.skypoint.com/~waltzmn/ByzPrior.html
Posted by: Clifton D. Healy at October 2, 2006 01:57 PM